NOTHING BUT OWLS!
December 28th, 2005

getting piggy.


Odin

Originally uploaded by rari-artig.

this guinea pig is named odin. he’s not mine. i found this picture on flickr.

this christmas was pretty low key and not super bad (though not super great). i can’t remember much about it. i saw my cousins- evan is now an inch taller than me, which is a sort of sad day. oh well.

i’m blogging about this guinea pig because i’m getting one soon. hopefully in less than two weeks my brother will come down to the beast and help me set up my new furry friend. i’m very excited. i will take it on walks, let it hang out with me, feed it dried apricots, and make the little thing feel loved. i just need to find a british prime minister to name it after.

by kendrak | Posted in blagg | No Comments » |
December 28th, 2005

sausage king gets grilled

remember the suasage king? well, he’s .

The self-proclaimed San Leandro sausage king, sentenced to death in February for murdering three meat inspectors during a 2000 rampage, was found dead early Tuesday on Death Row at San Quentin Prison.

Guards found Stuart Alexander, 44, unresponsive and not breathing about 4:30 a.m. in a suicide-watch cell, said Sgt. Eric Messick, a prison spokesman. Alexander could not be resuscitated, and the prison physician pronounced him dead at 5:15 a.m.

Although Alexander had been put on suicide watch on Christmas Eve and had been receiving psychiatric care, it did not appear that the former San Leandro mayoral candidate had killed himself, Messick said. Officials found no signs of foul play and believe Alexander died of natural causes, authorities said.

The Marin County coroner conducted an autopsy Tuesday but was awaiting the results of toxicology tests — which could take weeks — before determining how Alexander, who had gained a tremendous amount of weight in the years since the killings, died.

i bet arnold’s pissed that he can’t kill him.

December 23rd, 2005

paying for punditry? *gasp*

this artile from slate about pundits being paid to be published (say that 10 times fast) isn’t suprising. it is making me feel a little bit better about my whole disillusionment with partisan politics. in my public quest to sort out the mess the nuts have made, it’s heartwarming to read about the inherent corruption in the press that i assumed people took for granted. apparently not. in the article, michael kinsley wirtes:

In recent months, we have learned that the Bush administration sees nothing wrong with paying for pro-American articles to be planted in Iraqi newspapers. Some have criticized this practice as an unhelpful lesson in how to run a democracy. But the administration has done the same thing, more or less, here at home, giving a fat grant to multimedia black conservative Armstrong Williams for pushing administration policy on his TV show, in his newspaper column, and so on. And now it seems that a figure somewhat more influential than the president among the nation’s legislators—Jack Abramoff—has been doing the same thing.

Liberals, meanwhile, don’t seem to trust the power of their own ideas to win without cheating any more than conservatives do. In Los Angeles, liberals have organized an infantile protest over changes in the L.A. Times’ op-ed page, urging subscribers to renew for just three months and await further instructions about whether the paper has used that time satisfactorily to expunge itself of deviationism.

queue: *shock* *horror*. both infractions are so blatant i would have guessed people would have figured it out for themselves already, but they haven’t. it’s nice to note that both sides are equally bad. of course the conservatives are easier to admonish since the government/establishment shouldn’t stoop to such tactics, but the opposition shouldn’t pander either.

the last paragraph sums it up niceley:

So, opinions are merely counters, and those counters are for sale. That’s what I mean by the commodification of opinion. Or that is what I would mean if I were ever to use such a pretentious term.

indeed.

by kendrak | Posted in news stuff, politics | No Comments » |
December 23rd, 2005

free advice no.18

the friday before christmas and i’m here at work. nobody else is, not even the jerk. allright, that’s quite cheesy enough. sorry. seriously nobody’s here, and it’s really annoying because i need to meet with people. oh well. i’m lazy and tired, so this is a half-assed free advice ala dear abby. remember free advice no.9, with the naked dad airing out his hemorrhoids? well here’s the readers’ responses:

DEAR [KENDRA]: The letter about the man who parades around naked in front of his daughters after his shower prompts my letter. His stated reason is he claims he’s hot and needs to air-dry his hemorrhoids. Well, my advice for him is to wrap a towel around his waist, go straight to his bedroom, shut the door and do his “airing” there. Then if he wants, he can stand on his head and air-dry them as long as he darn well pleases. When he’s done, he can get dressed and join the family. And if this doesn’t please him, send him to a shrink. — SIMPLE SOLUTION, TWIN FALLS, IDAHO

dear simple,

your solution won’t appeal to him because he can’t show his junk to his family. where’s the love in that? he does need to go to a shrink. heh heh. shrinkage.

i hope this helps.

DEAR [KENDRA]: My father also did that, and I turned out just fine. I’m female, 37, happily married with no emotional scars. Unless the wife has reason to think he’s a predator, she should relax. Americans — and I am one — are far too hung up on nudity. — BETTINA IN CROSSVILLE, TENN.

dear bettina,

you’re so enlightened, aren’t you? americans are hung up on nudity, and it’s fine. you go see some fat naked german geriatric and tell me other. america is a place you can get your kink on, just not near me.

i hope this helps.

DEAR [KENDRA]: Only people with dirty minds equate nudity (especially that of a family member) with sex. Those girls are probably so used to it by now they think nothing of it. I suspect this is a power struggle between the husband and wife, and it’s none of the mother-in-law’s business. — DISGUSTED IN CANADA

dear disgusted,

just because the girls are used to it doesn’t mean they like it. they probably roll their eyes and say, “oh boy, dad’s naked again. how nasty.” the mother-in-law shouldn’t be involved because it’s none of her damm business, but the dad is sick.

i hope this helps.

DEAR [KENDRA]: The father’s actions are criminal. He’s sexually abusing the eyes and emotions of those unwilling witnesses. The wife and mother-in-law should document the times and dates of these assaults. With that documentation they can force Dad into therapy long enough to root out the evil beginnings of this perverse behavior. — PSYCHOTHERAPIST FROM NEW JERSEY

dear psycho,

you just want more patients. stop being so greedy and preying on the ills of others.

i hope this helps.

DEAR [KENDRA]: I am European. For us, it is completely normal to see our parents naked. There is nothing abnormal or wrong about it. — YASMINE (U.S. AIR FORCE)

dear yasmine,

i think there’s a fine line and the dad’s close to crossing it. europeans can’t be trusted anyhow. they think acid wash jeans patched with three shades of brown corduroy and faux-hawk mullets are hip. they’re not.

i hope this helps.

DEAR [KENDRA]: I almost spewed my coffee when I saw the letter about the guy letting his hemorrhoids air-dry in front of his daughters. Can I say one word here? Bathrobe! — PAUL IN FAIRBORN, OHIO

dear paul,

spewing coffee is lame and a waste of coffee. you’re right though, dad needs a robe and some prerparation h.

i hope this helps.

DEAR [KENDRA]: You should have advised “Disgusted” to tell her daughter to try once more to calmly and intelligently reason with her husband. And if that doesn’t do the trick, the daughter should inform her mother-in-law about his behavior. One call from his mother, and I’ll bet the practice would stop! — VIVIAN IN MASSACHUSETTS

dear vivian,

ohh, that might work. but it also could backfire. what if he learned it from her? then she’d be upset, and then there’d be a war of the moms, and nothing good will happen. i say public humiliation with coworkers.

i hope this helps.

DEAR [KENDRA]: I’d get a video camera and film him without his knowledge. Then, when his family comes to visit over the holidays, I’d announce that I have a “special home video” to show. Maybe when everyone has seen him like that, her husband will make an appointment with a surgeon to have those hemorrhoids removed. — BERNIE IN AYLETT, VA.

dear bernie,

you have the best solution so far. nothing gets people to stop being weird jerks than gran humiliation. i know it’s worked with me.

hope your rhoids are better.

i hope this helps.

DEAR [KENDRA]: I had a similar problem with my husband and son. Every night they’d come to the dinner table and eat their meal shirtless. Finally, I decided I’d had enough — so I calmly took off my shirt and proceeded to eat my meal. (They got the message!) — DAWNELLE IN ALTUS, OKLA.

dear dawnelle,

you live in a trailer, i’m guessing. good thing you lerned your boys some manners. kudos!

i hope this helps.

by kendrak | Posted in free advice | No Comments » |
December 21st, 2005

i’m on the verge of a crisis of faith.

this post is the beginning of a self-involved, over-worked, and most likeley fruitless attempt to come to terms with my general disgust with the world. perhaps its because so many people around me seem outraged that the world is a sucky place full of lies and deceit. everybody thinks they’re better than whomever they’re against, yet they’re really no better than the people they’re complaining about. i fully recognise the hypocrisy of that last statement which adds to my frustration.

i’m tired of the name calling, the accusations, and the rest of the drama in national and international politics. i’m tired of the arrogance and smugness from the wingnuts to the right and the left. i’m tired of people immediately crying “bias!!!” without any further explanation or analysis. i’m tired of the lack of subtlety or level-headed discourse, and what is out there it’s being overshadowed by the people who claim to be “fair and balanced” or whatever.

i appologise for the emotional tenor of this post- i’m just fed up. i’m sure this doesn’t come as a suprise to anybody, as i’ve been “jaded into moderation” since i came to berkeley. i’ve also become obsessed with bias, legitimacy of sources, and the like from my studies in history. it’s funny to see this type of behaviour now and compare it with the type of hysteria from jacobites. i guess it’s more painful now because i don’t get historical distance.

allright, this is joe’s last night in town and i need to stop getting worked up over idiots from every shade of blue and red. i also want to stress that there’s nothing wrong with “small l” libertarians. “big l” libertarians- feel free to mock/despise. “small l” are just more concerned with civil liberties than playing the same partisan bullshit you get from instapundit or dailykos. the only problem, is that when a “small l” talks about librertarian vaules, most chumps automatically assume they are a “big l”. i guess this is to be expected because people don’t like to think about things that aren’t extreme. read about libertarian socialism.

by kendrak | Posted in politics, rants, whinging | No Comments » |
December 20th, 2005

another anti-hero for all time

one of the best things about the homemade tivo is watching tv in a whole new way. no commercials! everything faster than normal so i’m not suckering as much of my life away, yet still enjoying quality entertainment. i also can record shows i’d never watch normally due to time. re-enter the rockford files.

when i was a kid, there were a few shows i remember watching with my mom. perry mason was one of them (which has completely vanished from the schedule), and rockford files was another one. (oh, and we can’t forget streets of san francisco, a quinn martin production. oh and quincy!)

jim rockford was different from the others in that he wasn’t trying to out-smart, out-wit, or out-do everybody. he just wanted to get by, more or less. he didn’t take hot air or crap, unless it was from a pretty lady. he wasn’t trying to be a hero, but get by as best as he could given his circumstances. he was realistic and human, which contrasted to perry mason who seemed like a juridical robot. how much of that is the difference between james garner and raymond burr? jim rockford didn’t have della street, he had his answering machine.

the other thing that makes rockford files so great is the ensemble of supporting characters. i always had an affinity toward angel for some stupid reason, lord knows why. rocky is always likeable, but angel got all the laughs. i could go on, but i think i’ll just watch another episode.

and… mike post wrote the theme for the show. you know how it goes. (the first time i ever saw mr t. experience i knew i’d have to like them since the theme to rockford files was played right before they went on.) yeah, mike fucking post! he’s the guy behind the law & order theme! behind the a-team! behind hillstreet blues! he’s made most of my favourite shows just that much more awesome.

by kendrak | Posted in blagg | No Comments » |
December 20th, 2005

“eat them, eat them, here they are…”

when i was a wee kid, i heard tales of “green eggs and ham” rap by flashmaster frank and kenny kaos. the fan kids knew about it, but few had heard it. when i started working at kalx, lots of the “more established” volunteers who had been there at the time told me about, but i never heard it until rick sylvain played it for me one night after kalx live. it was on an old beat up cart which was quickly dying. the pads were worn and the tape was degrading, making playback somewhat muffled and very quiet, but it was there.

i don’t really know the full story behind it, but here’s what i’ve heard- back during the 1984 kalx fundraiser, dr. frank, i mean “flashmaster frank”, rapped green eggs and ham over the instrumental track for “the message”. kenny kaos was there too. from what i’ve heard, it was a very spontaneous fundraiser ploy that was recorded and immortalized on a little green cart, and subsequently filed away and forgotten over the years. i played it a bunch, and people always liked it. the most common reaction was either “i’ve not heard this in years!” or “what is this? it’s great!” unfortunately, as the cart machines died out, and the cart it was on died, so too did the song. it may have been digitized, but of course it’d never see the light of day.

moving to now. i had an mp3 of it, which was lost during the first great i-purge. i meant to upload it, but lost it first. well, i just got another copy of it from rick sylvain which i’ve put here. listen to it!

by kendrak | Posted in blagg, kalx, music | 2 Comments » |
December 19th, 2005

the one box that is fun.

today the ups guy delivered a package. he’s the same ups guy that i saw everyday when i worked at chemistry, and we joke about the good old days. nobody here knew his name before i worked here, but they all do now. moving on…

today he brought by a box that was actually packed well- nothing rattling, appropriately dense enough- and i joked that it wasn’t anything fun, so he should take it back. i assumed it was books. he used a pen to write fun in bold letter on the lable, and asked me to sign for it. when i opened said box it actually was fun, at least to me. we sent out most of our date stamps to be refurbished in the beginning of the month. (shock ensued when we discovered that that our 1 month stamp couldn’t go beyond 2005.) they came back! oh, how i love to stamp books, and now i can do it until 2010!

this is the highlight of my day so far.

by kendrak | Posted in library work | No Comments » |
December 19th, 2005

free advice no.17

so it’s monday, and free advice is coming out a little late. i could try to explain why this is, but what’s the point? friday was nothing but work obligations, and i didn’t even get dressed this weekend, instead lounging around in a sort of puke like state in my pajamas. tres chic. but that’s over, for here comes last week’s free advice straight outta chicago… ask amy

Dear[Kendra]: A good friend called me and broke down in tears because of her oldest daughter. She whispered, “We found out she’s smoking pot!” More sobbing followed.

[Kendra], she was overreacting!

Years ago, when her daughter was 2 (she’s almost 15 now), this friend and her husband were our neighbors. We were all pot smokers. We were not parents of the year, but because being parents came to mean more to us than anything else, we changed our behavior (except for my ex-husband, hence the “ex”).

My friend’s hysterics didn’t seem warranted. I felt she was being hypocritical.

That was my initial reaction, but now I’m wondering. My daughter is almost 12 and has been through drug-awareness education at school. I keep tabs on her, but I’m a realist.

Odds are, someone will offer her booze or pot or some equivalent. We’ve discussed drug and alcohol use (she’s aware that her father has a problem with alcohol), and I honestly believe she will refuse such an offer. But you never know.

How much of my own experiences do I share? And then, if I share, how do I rebut the inevitable argument, “You did it; why can’t I?”

How do I use the truth to help, and not hurt, her?

–Potsticker

dear potsticker,

hypocrites really piss me off. you hung out with people who smoked a lot even though they had a kid, but realised you were above it when your kid came around? i think that’s right. i was just checking.

you do have a realistic view when it comes to your daughter and drug use, and you need to keep the communication open with her. you might get lucky, and she’ll be straight edge. you could also end up with a junkie, but who knows.

parents who become morally indignant when they find out their kids are using (when they have) are concerned for their kids, and don’t want them to make the same mistakes they did. they’re also ignoring the fact that they’re hypocrites and that their methodology isn’t really convincing. there has to be a balance between being permissive and overbearing. kids shouldn’t really be pot-heads (neither should adults), and let them understand why they shouldn’t- they’re young and need to finish growing.

when kids are using it’s not the end of the world. it’s the end of turning a blind eye, but there’s still time to let them know it’s not the time to do stupid things like that.

all this could be taken too far, and you could be a family that uses together. yeah… “mom, could i borrow your razor and mirror? i left mine in the car.” “dad, where’s the bong?” “grandpa, do you have a clean needle?” that all sounds pretty sick. some people see lighting up as a family bonding experience. i call them hippies and they should be avoided.

your friend sounds like a “reformed” hippie who now where polar fleece and drives a volvo. she’s scum.

don’t be bitchy and keep it real. own up to your hippie days and remind her how lame they are. hopefully you have a stoned uncle to reference.

i hope this helps.

Dear [Kendra]: I am in a wonderful relationship with a guy. We have an “unofficial” (by standard terms, though to us, it’s “real”) boyfriend/girlfriend relationship. We’ve never exchanged any “let’s be official” words, and when someone asks, I don’t know what to say!

To everyone, including ourselves, we’re boyfriend and girlfriend. I don’t want to give anyone the wrong idea by answering either way if I’m asked if we’re “official.”

What’s worse is when people ask “how many months,” I don’t know how to answer.

How can I answer these questions without embarrassing myself?

– An (Un)Official Relationship

dear an,

do you want to be official? writing to me makes me think you do. if that’s the case, ask your boyfriend for clarification. if you don’t want to, for fear or upsetting the apple cart, it’ll never be “official”. hopefully this is a young relationship, within the first 6 months when things like this are expected. if not, you both are suckers.

i hope this helps.

by kendrak | Posted in free advice | No Comments » |
December 19th, 2005

it’s still sorta dark

i woke up today at 2:20 to get to kalx in time to play 9 long songs from 0330-0600. phoning it in indeed. i can’t recall the full play list, but i played rush, manowar, and the distress signals, so you know it was a fun time.

i’ve been at work since 6:30 and it’s still droning.

i just did a huge chunk of my xmas shopping, which really wasn’t much. i have 3 more people to buy for (4 if you count joe), but oh well. i’m trying to pick a good reputable charity to donate to for pakistani relief, but it’s proving to be more difficult than i anticipated. charity navigator has made me cautious of the costs of administration and fundraising. the problem is, i want to donate to a charity who spends at least 95% of their money (preferably more) on the program costs (relief), but i also want to make sure it’s as neutral as possible. i don’t want to fund missionaries or anything like that, but how can you be sure?

oh well. free advice will be up shortly.

by kendrak | Posted in kalx, personal stuff, rants | No Comments » |
December 16th, 2005

shake shake shake!

whooo!!! we had an earthquake this morning. (odd, that it’s the same day the san jose quakes are moving to houston.) anyhow… what fun that was. 3.4 and coming out of hercules. i guess that’s decently close. i don’t know. i was wondering how intense it was here, but after taking the survey, i found that 99 other people agreed with me. that’s sort of nice.

in good news- nobody was in the stacks, and nobody was injured. one of my coworkers lamented that it’d be nice if one of our less cheerfull/compliant employees was here at the time and a book fell. she thinks i’m silly for asking people to wear hardhats in the stacks. i might be silly, but i’m also safety conscious. she’s just vain.

by kendrak | Posted in library work, news stuff, rants | No Comments » |
December 15th, 2005

141 weeks?

i read publishers weekly for work, and usually it’s not very interesting. you get to see what the industry’s pushing this week. every so often i find a book that sounds interesting or yet another history book with some vague noun/feeling as the title. happiness: a history is the latest one i’ve read about. after the major disappointment of guns, germs, and steel i think i’ll pass.

the other thing that’s good about pw is the best sellers lists. did you know that the da vinci code is still on the hardcover(fiction) bestsellers list? it’s no.5 and been on there for 141 weeks!!!! am i missing something? dan brown is making way too much money off of fibonacci.

by kendrak | Posted in history, news stuff, rants | No Comments » |
December 14th, 2005

some musical thoughts

so i’m sitting at my desk whistling robbie williams’ “let me entertain you”, because my brain is music goo. ever since i got to talking with frank last week about the soundtrack to his book, king dork, i’ve been on a weird 70s rock kind of kick. i need to get me some stuff by the sweet. i ended up listening to a lot of t. rex, which is awesome, but it’s not the sweet. here’s some vague ideas i’ve been kicking about:

  • t.rex is better than tyrannosaurus rex, which is odd since logic would dictate they should suck. this weekend i tried to figure out why shellac isn’t nearly as good as big black, and i’ve decided it’s because they’re not as loud and energetic. alec described it as listless, which i guess it true. they’re also way too into wanky slow jams.

  • this whole “i like queen.” thing isn’t really set in stone. “radio gaga” is a good song, but “let me entertain you” sucks. i’ll work on it some more.
  • “stairway to heaven” still sucks. it’s an 8 minute song!!!!! blech. i’m not a big fan of the zep.
by kendrak | Posted in music | No Comments » |
December 12th, 2005

a, b, c, d, e, fuþark

so tonight i wake up from a long sick nap (sick in that i feel like schesise), eat some hot and sour soup, and see joe reading something from boing boing about the evolution of the latin alphabet. of course the timeline is very “classic”-centric in that it goes directly from phonecian to greek to latin. nevermind that the timeline seems a little off. the full distinction between i and j didn’t happen until well after the renaissance, (which is why washingon d.c. doesn’t have a j street.)

ok, now my dedication to the history and quirks of germanic (west) languages isn’t really a secret. of course the first thing i thought upon seeing the time line was, “of course those culture snobs wouldn’t know about anything cool like futhark!” futhark is the germanic runic alphabet. of course this doesn’t really have a big impact upon the latin alphabet, but it’s often overlooked and underappreciated.

there’s some runic stuff written in the women’s bathroom at the cock ring- weird.

by kendrak | Posted in germanic, history, linguistic stuff | No Comments » |













Powered by Wordpress using the theme bbv1